Overview | |
---|---|
Definition (Hover Text) | The Defect Removal Efficiency (DRE) KPI measures how effectively the development team is at fixing defects that arise from new functionalities within an iteration. |
Source Tools | Jira, Azure Boards |
Graph type | Line Chart |
Filters | - |
Hover Format on KPI | Sprint Name: <<Percentage Value>> Closed Defects: <<Value>> Total Defects : <<Value>> |
Fields on Overlay |
|
Business Logic | |
Calculation Formula |
|
Trend | A higher DRE percentage indicates better quality, as it means more defects are being fixed within the same iteration they were found |
Maturity Levels | DRE maturity is assessed by averaging data from the last 5 sprints. This helps in understanding the stability and improvement over time. M1 <25% M2 >=25-50% , M3 - >=50-75% , M4 - >=75-90% , M5 - >=90% |
Instance level thresholds | Target KPI Value denotes the bare minimum a project should maintain for a KPI. |
Global Configurations- (Field Mapping) | |
Processor Fields | Whenever we update the defect mapping and issue type mapping, whether we add or remove any issue type, we must run the processor. This is necessary to show the changes in the KPI. Defect Mapping :
|
Mandatory fields
| Project Settings
Defect Mapping :
|
How to Validate KPI | |
Suggested ways of working | |
Sample JQLs | JQL query to get the defects found and fixed during a sprint: project = "Your Project Name" AND issuetype = Bug AND Sprint in closedSprints() AND status in (Done, Closed) JQL query to get the total defects found during and after a sprint: project = "Your Project Name" AND issuetype = Bug AND (Sprint in closedSprints() OR createdDate > endOfSprint) |
Best Practices | |
Automate Testing | Implement automated testing (unit, integration, and end-to-end tests) to catch defects early in the development process. |
Pair Programming | Implement pair programming to increase code quality and reduce the likelihood of defects being introduced. |
Adopt TDD/BDD | Use Test-Driven Development (TDD) or Behavior-Driven Development (BDD) methodologies to write tests before code, ensuring that functionality is well-defined and tested from the start. |
Use Static Analysis Tools | Implement static code analysis tools to automatically check code for potential defects and enforce coding standards. |
Benefits of KPI | |
Quality Measurement | It helps in measuring the quality of the code being produced and identifying areas where improvements are needed. |
Predictability | Understanding the defect injection rate removal efficiency can help in forecasting the amount of rework required and in planning more accurately. |
Cost Reduction | Reducing the defect injection rate removal efficiency can lead to lower costs associated with fixing bugs, especially those found later in the development cycle or after release. |
Process Improvement | By tracking this metric, teams can identify stages in the development process where defects are commonly introduced and take steps to improve those stages. |
...