Defect Injection Rate
Overview | |
---|---|
Applicability | Scrum-based projects |
Definition (Hover Text) | Measures the total number of defects (bugs) linked to closed user stories of a sprint. |
Source Tools | Jira, Azure Boards |
Graph type | Line chart |
Filters | <None> |
Hover Format on KPI | Sprint Name: <<Percentage Value>> Defects: <<Value>> Closed Stories: <<Value>> |
Fields on Explore Overlay |
|
Business Logic | |
Calculation Formula | No. of defects tagged to all stories closed in an iteration/ Total no. of stories closed in the iteration.
ExampleImagine your team completed 30 stories in a sprint. Out of these, 6 stories had defects. The Defect Rate would be: Defect Rate=6 / 30 =0.2 or 20% This means 20% of the completed stories had defects, which helps in understanding the quality of the work done during the sprint.
|
KPI Settings |
*Please note:- Global mappings and default Jira statuses of sprint reports will apply if the KPI level settings are not used. |
Trend | A downward trend in DIR is desirable. This means fewer defects are being injected over time. |
Maturity Levels | DIR maturity is assessed by averaging data from the last 5 sprints. This helps in understanding the stability and improvement over time. M2: 175% -125% M3: 125%-75% M4: 75-25% M5: 25% |
Instance level thresholds | Target KPI Value denotes the bare minimum a project should maintain for a KPI. |
Global Configurations- (Field Mapping) | |
Processor Fields | Whenever we update the defect mapping and issue type mapping, whether we add or remove any issue type, we must run the processor. This is necessary to show the changes in the KPI. Defect Mapping :
|
Mandatory fields
| Project Settings
Defect Mapping :
Issue type Mapping :
|
How to Validate KPI | |
Suggested ways of working |
|
Sample JQLs | project in ("XYZ") and component ="ABC" and type in (Defect) and issueFunction in linkedIssuesOf("type in (Story) AND sprint in(406)") |
Best Practices | |
Automate Testing | Implement automated testing (unit, integration, and end-to-end tests) to catch defects early in the development process. |
Pair Programming | Implement pair programming to increase code quality and reduce the likelihood of defects being introduced. |
Adopt TDD/BDD | Use Test-Driven Development (TDD) or Behavior-Driven Development (BDD) methodologies to write tests before code, ensuring that functionality is well-defined and tested from the start. |
Use Static Analysis Tools | Implement static code analysis tools to automatically check code for potential defects and enforce coding standards. |
|
|
Benefits of KPI | |
Quality Measurement | It helps in measuring the quality of the code being produced and identifying areas where improvements are needed. |
Predictability | Understanding the defect injection rate can help in forecasting the amount of rework required and in planning more accurately. |
Cost Reduction | Reducing the defect injection rate can lead to lower costs associated with fixing bugs, especially those found later in the development cycle or after release. |
Process Improvement | By tracking this metric, teams can identify stages in the development process where defects are commonly introduced and take steps to improve those stages. |
|
|
© 2022 Publicis Sapient. All rights reserved.
This document is being migrated to a new Space starting April 1, 2025. To ensure continued access to documents, please upgrade to the latest version of KnowHOW.